UK Approves Plans to House 1,256 Asylum Seekers Near Oxfordshire Village Despite Local Opposition

The UK government has granted planning permission for a former Ministry of Defence site near Piddington, Oxfordshire, to be converted into temporary accommodation for 1,256 male asylum seekers, despite strong opposition from residents.

Housing Secretary Angela Rayner approved the proposal for the former MoD Bicester site, which is located close to the village of Piddington. The decision has reignited tensions between the government and local residents, who have repeatedly raised concerns about the impact of the accommodation on their community.

Opposition to the proposal became particularly visible in September, when residents held a symbolic referendum in which 285 people voted for the village to leave the United Kingdom, while 26 voted against. Although the referendum has no legal effect, it was intended to demonstrate residents’ frustration over the government’s plans.

Local Liberal Democrat MP Calum Miller described the approval as deeply disappointing, arguing that ministers had ignored concerns raised by residents and local authorities. He also highlighted potential pressure on transport, healthcare and other public services, including warnings that nearby GP practices have limited capacity.

However, the government says the decision is part of efforts to reduce its reliance on hotels for asylum accommodation. In its explanation, Rayner said the site’s security arrangements, boundaries and staffing would help limit potential risks relating to public safety, safeguarding and community relations.

The Home Office has also presented the facility as a temporary arrangement intended to provide additional capacity while responding to changing demand for asylum accommodation.

The decision has attracted criticism from opposition politicians, with Conservative representatives accusing the government of disregarding the wishes of local people. Piddington Parish Council chairman Tim McNally has also accused ministers of failing to be transparent about the proposal and indicated that residents are considering legal action.

There is now a six-week period during which the planning decision can be challenged in court. The approval allows the proposed temporary use of the site, but the legal process and outstanding concerns could still affect what happens next.

The controversy highlights the continuing political disagreement over how the UK should accommodate asylum seekers, particularly as the government seeks to reduce hotel use while addressing concerns from communities expected to host alternative facilities.